Connect with us

law

ENRON’S MANY STANDS: The Investigation; ANDERSEN LAW CRIMINAL CHARGED OBSTRUCTION in ENRON INQUIRY

Published

on

In the very first criminal case ever filed against an accounting firm of significant importance, Arthur Andersen has been charged with a single charge of obstruction of justice for the destruction of thousands of documents relating to the Enron investigation, as the Justice Department announced today.

The indictment, handed down by the grand jury last week and released today, details organized efforts by Andersen to shred documents related to Enron in four offices of the company located in Houston, Chicago, London and Portland, Ore. This was the first charge of criminality that resulted from the investigation into the company’s collapse in December.

Advertisement

Obstruction of justice is a serious matter and one that the department is very concerned about the case, said Larry D. Thompson, deputy attorney general in the Justice Department. “Arthur Andersen is accused of committing an act that impedes the justice system in general in that it hinders inspectors and regulators from arriving into the facts.”

Andersen Andersen, who quickly announced that it would fight the accusation with force, said it was not guilty of having committed any offence and also criticized the government for an unprecedented infraction of prosecutorial discretion without precedent. [News analysis Page C1.[News analysis, Page C1.

The firm stated in the statement that a criminal investigation against the entire company for infractions of the law is legally and factually unjust.

Advertisement

Andersen is struggling to stay alive in some way. It was trying to agree to sell parts of its operations to KPMG, the leading accounting firm. But the likelihood of such a sale was considered to be low.

In the evening at midnight, it was reported that the Securities and Exchange Commission took various measures in an emergency to reduce the impact of the Andersen indictment. Andersen is among the Big Five accounting firms and provides auditing services to more than 20% of publicly traded businesses across the United States.

The S.E.C. decided that any client of Andersen’s who chooses to quit the company could submit unaudited financial statements with audited financial records due 60 days after. Government officials believe that the option will only be used occasionally. However, they are concerned that releasing unaudited financial reports could cause anxiety among investors.

Advertisement

The S.E.C. was concerned that certain Andersen partners could quit the company or foreign offices could split up. According to the new S.E.C. rules, businesses whose audits Andersen will complete after today have to get assurances from the firm regarding the quality of its work and control, as well as the assurance that the employees engaged in the audit will remain accessible.

The charge — aimed at the entire company instead of individuals comes at a crucial moment in Andersen’s struggle to stay alive. The company’s divisions are beginning to appear between partners, according to those familiar with the internal discussions. Although many partners want to fight the government, others believe that the company should be disbanded, thus removing the ability of the government to go to trial.

However, there are clear indications that the company is planning to go down two paths to keep its business running and fight the criminal case and other legal issues that stem from its Enron work. The company was informed today that a small team of partners in the senior ranks would temporarily take on the responsibility of many of the operations at Andersen. At the same time, management continues to deal with legal issues.

Advertisement

But, Andersen fully expects the American operations to be cut in the next few weeks and months due to the pressures on the economy created by the ongoing scandal intensify. We expect significant losses to the company in the coming months. The spokesperson said Charles Leonard, a spokesman for Andersen.

Lawyers representing the firm, who spoke anonymously, claimed they were moving swiftly to dismiss the charges, challenging its legality and factual exactness. They also stated that they were planning to force prosecutors to reveal that Andersen’s partners were involved in the criminal motive that, the lawyers said, was needed to indict the whole company.

The decision of the government to file the first indictment of the Enron case against Andersen indicates a bold strategy being employed by the prosecutor. In their more considerable fraud investigation, they want to cut off manageable pieces of the research and bring charges swiftly.

Advertisement

This strategy increases the pressure on witnesses to strike deals since they know that an indictment can be filed without warning or sealed without the knowledge of witnesses, a situation that limits their negotiation abilities.

The release of the indictment in the Federal District Court in Houston followed over a fortnight, sometimes heated talks with the federal government and Andersen. The prosecutor told the firm that it had until the 9th of this morning to either plead guilty or face being indicted.

Andersen rejected the deal late on Wednesday night. Richard J. Favretto, an attorney with Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw who represents Andersen the firm, informed Leslie Caldwell, the prosecutor in charge of the Enron task group. The firm will not admit guilt regardless of the time limit.

Advertisement

Communication between government officials and Andersen became particularly tense during the days leading up to the trial.

On Wednesday evening, late Wednesday night, and late Wednesday night. Favretto sent a letter to Michael Chertoff, the deputy attorney general, in which he criticized the government’s plans for indictment one point at a time,

Mr Chertoff responded in a two-page letter to the editor today, explaining the destruction of documents as a part of a series of blunders that, when put together, eventually demanded criminal charges be brought.

Advertisement

Also, among other things. Chertoff wrote the destruction of documents in the Enron case occurred just a few months after Andersen reached an arrangement with S.E.C. in connection with an accounting fraud investigation that involved an additional Andersen client, Waste Management. As part of the arrangement, Andersen agreed not to make any mistakes to the same extent in the future.

Mr Chertoff also stated that, in this instance, documents were not destroyed due to an innocent motive. “The incident here was not the result of a single incident of a handful of low-level employees acting out of fear or making a mistake in a panic,” he said.

In the letter In his letter, the letter reads. Chertoff also rejected the argument of Andersen’s lawyers that the government should be held accountable for the financial implications of the firm’s arrest. The reputation of Andersen is in danger because of its misconduct but not because the government implements laws against the misconduct the firm committed,” he wrote.

Advertisement

The indictment provides only a few details. The indictment states that obstruction of justice started in October. 10, but it does not specify the documents destroyed at the time or who did it.

The only thing in the indictment relevant to that day is the decision of the company the day before to employ the services of an external law company to deal with any future litigation involving Enron. The indictment states that the firm hired an outside law firm to handle future litigation. The prosecutor’s office allegedly viewed this as a signal that the firm knew that investigation would soon start.

Andersen’s legal team said yesterday that Andersen legal team stated yesterday that the company of Davis, Polk & Wardwell was hired to aid Andersen if the Enron situation was becoming more complicated, but not for the sole purpose of helping in litigation or representing the company during investigations.

Advertisement

In an internal investigation by the lawyers of Andersen, the wholesale shredding started a few weeks later in Houston on the 23rd of October. 23 the day following Andersen, partners in Houston learned the S.E.C. was contacting them was set to demand accounting records related to Enron.

The indictment does not provide specifics about the destruction of documents outside Houston. The investigation revealed that the devastation that occurred in Portland and London was at the direction of Partners from Houston. The report doesn’t detail the number of materials destroyed in London; however, it does state that only a tiny amount was torn up in Portland.

In Chicago, According to the attorneys of Andersen’s firm, the documents were destroyed in September — well before any S.E.C. investigation — based on the direction of the firm’s legal department.

Advertisement

The indictment will add to Andersen’s problems on another front, with the state government regulating auditors.

Accounting boards in various states, including Texas, Florida and Connecticut, are already investigating Andersen and Enron. The volume of these investigations is likely to rise dramatically due to the indictment. Each state board will examine the impact of the Andersen-Enron scandal and what the implications will be, according to David A. Costello, president of the National Association of State Boards of Accountancy.

While some states may suspend Andersen’s licenses in other states, the state boards would need an indictment.

Advertisement

Robert A. Butterworth, the attorney general of Florida, stated that the criminal indictment could provide the state’s accounting board with the right to deny Andersen’s license. However, he noted the situation would prove unlucky that legal blame for the Enron decline began and ended with Arthur Andersen. Andersen was the weakest link due to the shredding and the severing of his ties,” he stated. “There is no way for the country to remain silent and let Andersen suffer the consequences for Enron.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

law

The Hidden Costs of Car Accidents: A Lawyer’s Perspective

Published

on

Car Accidents

Car accidents are a common occurrence on roads and highways across the country. While the direct costs of car accidents, such as property damage, medical expenses, lost wages, and funeral expenses, are well known, there are many hidden costs that are often overlooked. As a lawyer who has worked with many car accident victims, I know firsthand the impact these hidden costs can have on a person’s life. In this article, we will explore the hidden costs of car accidents and the importance of understanding them.

Direct Costs of Car Accidents

The direct costs of car accidents are the most visible and easily quantifiable. These include property damage, medical expenses, lost wages, and funeral expenses. Property damage can be costly, particularly if a car is totaled or requires extensive repairs. Medical expenses can quickly add up, particularly if a person requires hospitalization or surgery. Lost wages can be devastating, particularly if a person is unable to work for an extended period of time. Funeral expenses can be a significant burden for the family of a person who has been killed in a car accident.

Advertisement

Hidden Costs of Car Accidents

While the direct costs of car accidents are significant, the hidden costs can be even more devastating. These hidden costs include pain and suffering, emotional distress, future medical expenses, loss of future earning potential, impact on relationships, and impact on mental health. Pain and suffering can be difficult to quantify, but it is a very real cost of car accidents. Emotional distress can also be significant, particularly if a person experiences anxiety, depression, or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as a result of the accident. Future medical expenses can be a hidden cost if a person requires ongoing medical treatment or rehabilitation. Loss of future earning potential can also be significant, particularly if a person is unable to work at the same level as before the accident. The impact on relationships can also be a hidden cost, particularly if a person is unable to participate in activities they once enjoyed with family and friends. Finally, the impact on mental health can be significant, particularly if a person experiences anxiety, depression, or PTSD as a result of the accident.

Conclusion

Car accidents can have a significant impact on a person’s life, both in terms of the direct costs and the hidden costs. It is important for anyone who has been involved in a car accident to understand all of the costs involved, and to work with a lawyer who can help ensure that all costs are accounted for. Additionally, it is important for everyone to drive safely and to do their part to prevent car accidents from occurring in the first place.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

law

From Cramped Quarters to Chic Spaces: The Evolution of Lawyer Offices

Published

on

Lawyer Offices

As the legal profession has evolved over the years, so too have the spaces where lawyers work. From the cramped and dark offices of the past, to the modern and chic workspaces of today, there has been a significant shift in the design and layout of lawyer offices. In this article, we will explore the evolution of lawyer offices, examining the reasons behind the changes, and the benefits they offer to lawyers and their clients.

The Origins of Lawyer Offices

The origins of lawyer offices can be traced back to the early days of the legal profession, when lawyers would often work out of their homes or in small, cramped spaces. These early offices were often dark, cluttered, and lacking in basic amenities like heat, electricity, and running water. As the legal profession grew, however, so too did the need for more professional and functional office spaces.

Advertisement

The Rise of the Modern Lawyer Office

In the mid-20th century, there was a significant shift in the design and layout of lawyer offices. Offices became larger, more spacious, and more functional, with ample space for clients, staff, and equipment. The modern lawyer office was born, and it quickly became the standard for law firms across the country.

The Benefits of Modern Lawyer Offices

There are many benefits to modern lawyer offices, both for lawyers and their clients. One of the primary benefits is increased productivity. With larger, more functional workspaces, lawyers are able to work more efficiently and effectively, with fewer distractions and more opportunities for collaboration.

In addition to increased productivity, modern lawyer offices also offer improved client experiences. With comfortable seating areas, refreshment stations, and modern technology, clients feel more at ease and confident in the abilities of their legal team.

Advertisement

The Future of Lawyer Offices

As technology continues to evolve, so too will the design and layout of lawyer offices. The future of lawyer offices is likely to be even more focused on functionality, with more automation and digitization of processes. However, there will still be a need for personal interaction between lawyers and clients, and it is likely that the importance of client comfort and experience will only continue to grow.

Conclusion

The evolution of lawyer offices has been a long and fascinating journey, from the cramped and cluttered spaces of the past, to the modern and chic workspaces of today. As the legal profession continues to evolve, so too will the spaces where lawyers work, and it is likely that we will see even more exciting changes and innovations in the years to come.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

law

Meet the Attorney General of Texas: Exploring the Role and Responsibilities

Published

on

Attorney General of Texas

As the top law enforcement officer in the state of Texas, the Attorney General plays a critical role in protecting the rights and interests of Texans. If you’re curious about what the Attorney General does, keep reading to learn more about this important position.

Role of the Attorney General

The Attorney General of Texas is the chief lawyer for the state of Texas. In this role, the Attorney General serves as the legal advisor to the governor, state agencies, and other officials. The Attorney General is also responsible for representing the state in legal matters, including lawsuits and appeals. Additionally, the Attorney General is responsible for enforcing state laws, including consumer protection laws, environmental laws, and antitrust laws.

Advertisement

Responsibilities of the Attorney General

The Attorney General of Texas has a number of responsibilities, including:

1. Protecting Texans

One of the primary responsibilities of the Attorney General is to protect the rights and interests of Texans. This includes protecting consumers from fraud, enforcing environmental laws, and defending the state against lawsuits.

2. Providing Legal Advice

As the chief legal advisor to the state of Texas, the Attorney General is responsible for providing legal advice to state agencies and officials. This can include advice on issues related to contracts, employment law, and other legal matters.

Advertisement

3. Enforcing State Laws

The Attorney General is also responsible for enforcing state laws, including consumer protection laws, environmental laws, and antitrust laws. This can involve investigating violations of these laws and taking legal action to enforce them.

4. Representing the State in Legal Matters

The Attorney General represents the state of Texas in legal matters, including lawsuits and appeals. This can involve representing the state in cases related to criminal justice, civil rights, and other legal issues.

5. Advocating for Texans

Finally, the Attorney General is responsible for advocating for the interests of Texans. This can involve advocating for policies and laws that benefit Texans, as well as defending Texans against policies and laws that could harm them.

Advertisement

Meet the Current Attorney General of Texas

The current Attorney General of Texas is Ken Paxton, who was elected to the position in 2014. Prior to serving as Attorney General, Paxton served in the Texas House of Representatives and the Texas Senate. As Attorney General, Paxton has focused on issues related to border security, religious freedom, and gun rights.

Conclusion

The Attorney General of Texas plays a critical role in protecting the rights and interests of Texans. From providing legal advice to enforcing state laws, the Attorney General is responsible for a wide range of important tasks. If you’re interested in learning more about the role of the Attorney General in Texas, there are plenty of resources available to help you learn more.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.